Skip to main content
Log in

Metadata requirements for digital museum environments

  • Regular contribution
  • Published:
International Journal on Digital Libraries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe a system which addresses all the processes involved in digitally acquiring, modelling, storing, manipulating and creating virtual exhibitions from 3D museum artefacts. More specifically, we examine the significance of metadata in enabling and supporting all of these processes and describe the extensive facilities provided for authoring, maintaining and managing metadata. The development of the system has been heavily influenced by factors relating to interoperability, standards, museum best practice and feedback from two museum pilot sites. Finally, we briefly consider the system in the wider context of applications such as virtual learning environments and distributed repositories of archives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AMICO: The Art Museum Image Consortium. http://www.amico.org/ (last visited 23/12/03)

  2. AMICO Library. http://www.amico.org/library.html (last visited 23/12/03)

  3. ARCO: Augmented Representation of Cultural Objects. http://www.arco-web.org/ (last visited 23/12/03)

  4. ARCO Consortium (2001) ARCO Deliverable D3. User requirements and specifications.

  5. ARCO Consortium (2002) ARCO Deliverable D8. Report on the XML descriptions of the database cultural objects. http://www.arco-web.org/public-documents/

  6. ARCO Consortium (2002) ARCO Deliverable D9. Report on XML schemas, XSL style sheets and X-VRML technology. http://www.arco-web.org/public-documents/

  7. ARCO Data Model and Element Set. http://www.arco-web.org/ams/ (last visited 23/12/03)

  8. ARCO Deliverables. User requirements specifications, prototypes I–IV. October 2001–October 2003

  9. Baker T, Dekkers M, Heery R, Patel M, Salokhe G (2003) What terms does your metadata use? Application profiles as machine-understandable narratives. J Digital Inf 2(2). http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v02/i02/Baker/baker-final.pdf (last visited 23/12/03)

  10. Barton J, Currier D, Hey J (2003) Building quality assurance into metadata creation: an analysis based on the learning objects and e-prints communities of practice. In: Proceedings of the Dublin Core Conference, Seattle. http://www.siderean.com/dc2003/201_paper60.pdf (last visited 23/12/03)

  11. Billinghurst M, Kato H, Poupyrev I (2001) The MagicBook: a transitional AR interface. Comput Graph 25:745–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boehm B (1988) A spiral model of software development and enhancement. IEEE Computer 21(5):61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. CIDOC: International Committee for Documentation. http://www.cidoc.icom.org/guide (last visited 23/12/03)

  14. CIDOC CRM. http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/ (last visited 23/12/03)

  15. CIMI: The Consortium for the Computer Interchange of Museum Information. http://www.cimi.org/ (last visited 23/12/03)

  16. CIMI XML Schema for SPECTRUM v1.5. http://www.cimi.org/wg/xml_spectrum/index.html (last visited 23/12/03)

  17. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. http://www.dublincore.org/ (last visited 23/12/03)

  18. Dushay N, Hillman D (2003) Analyzing metadata for effective use and re-use. In: Proceedings of the Dublin Core Conference, Seattle. http://www.siderean.com/dc2003/501_paper24.pdf

  19. Duval E, Hodgins W, Sutton S, Weibel S (2002) Metadata principles and practicalities. D-Lib Mag 8(4)

  20. EMII: European Museums’ Information Institute. http://www.emii.org/ (last visited 23/12/03)

  21. Extensible 3D Graphics, X3D Consortium. http://www.web3d.org/x3d/ (last visited 23/12/03)

  22. Gilliland-Swetland AJ (1998) Defining metadata. In: Baca M (ed) Introduction to metadata. Getty Information Institute, Los Angeles

  23. Heery R, Patel M (2000) Application profiles: mixing and matching metadata schemas. Ariadne, issue 25. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue25/app-profiles/intro.html (last visited 23/12/03)

  24. Iconclass. http://www.iconclass.nl/index.html (last visited 23/12/03)

  25. IEEE Learning Object Metadata. http://www.ischool.washington.edu/sasutton/IEEE1484.html (last visited 23/12/02)

  26. IFLA, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.pdf (last visited 23/12/03)

  27. ISO 15386: The Dublin Core Metadata Element Set. http://www.niso.org/international/SC4/sc4docs.html (last visited 23/12/03)

  28. Kato H, Billinghurst M, Poupyrev I, Imamoto K, Tachibana K (2000) Virtual object manipulation on a table-top AR environment. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on augmented reality (ISAR’00), pp 111–119

  29. Lindholm J, Patel M (2002) ARCO internal report: a review of metadata use. SFP-Metadata-Review

  30. mda. http://www.mda.org.uk/ (last visited 23/12/03)

  31. Mourkoussis N, White M, Patel M, Chmielewski J, Walczak K (2003) AMS – Metadata for cultural exhibitions using virtual reality. In: Proceedings of DC2003, Seattle, September 2003. DCMI Press, pp 193–202. http://www.siderean.com/dc2003/601_Paper20.pdf (last visited 23/12/03)

  32. NISO Z39.87-2002 AIIM 20-2002 Data Dictionary – Technical Metadata for Digital Still Images. http://www.niso.org/committees/committee_au.html (last visited 23/12/03)

  33. Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting. http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html (last visited 23/12/03)

  34. OpenGL. http://www.opengl.org/about/overview.html (last visited 24/5/04)

  35. REACH. http://www.rlg.org/reach.html (last visited 23/12/03)

  36. SPECTRUM (1997) The UK Museum Documentation Standard, 2nd edn. Museum Documentation Association, Cambridge, UK

  37. Sussex Archaeological Society. http://www.sussexpast.co.uk/ (last visited 23/12/03)

  38. Victoria and Albert Museum, London, UK. http://www.vam.ac.uk/ (last visited 23/12/03)

  39. Virtual Reality Modeling Language, VRML97. http://www.web3d.org/x3d/specifications/vrlm/index.html (last visited 23/12/03)

  40. Visual Resource Association (VRA). http://www.vraweb.org/ (last visited 23/12/03)

  41. VRA Core 3.0. http://www.vraweb.org/vracore3.htm (last visited 23/12/03)

  42. W3C Recommendation, XML Schema. http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema (last visited 23/12/03)

  43. W3C Recommendation, RDF Schema. http://www.w3.org/RDF/ (last visited 23/12/03)

  44. W3C Recommendation, OWL. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/ (last visited 23/12/03)

  45. W3C Recommendation, XSLT. http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/ (last visited 23/12/03)

  46. Walczak K, Cellary W (2002) Building database applications of virtual reality with X-VRML. In: Proceedings of the Web3D 2002 symposium, 7th international conference on 3D Web technology, Tempe, AZ, pp 111–120

  47. Walczak K, Cellary W (2003) X-VRML for advanced virtual reality applications. IEEE Computer 36(3):89–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manjula Patel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patel, M., White, M., Mourkoussis, N. et al. Metadata requirements for digital museum environments. Int J Digit Libr 5, 179–192 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-004-0104-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-004-0104-x

Keywords

Navigation